Biting the hand that feeds them
Activists turn “human zoo” into Occupy-style working group
By Christian Viveros-Fauné. News, Issue 237, July-August
2012
Published online: 04 July 2012
What initially began as a
disagreement over the curator Artur Zmijewski’s decision to put global
activists on display during the 7th Berlin Biennale blossomed into an
out-and-out political revolt, just before the closing of the international
exhibition on 1 July.
Reacting to what members of Occupy
and M15 (the Spanish protest movement) characterised as a curatorial framework
that penned them into “a human zoo with a viewing platform where viewers
watch[ed] activists eat, assemble, fight and sleep,” the activists issued the
biennial’s authorities with a set of ultimatums. These demands included, among
others, dismantling “the hierarchical structure of the biennial” and replacing
it with an Occupy-style “working group”. These radical proposals were accepted
by Zmijewski and the associate curator, Joanna Warsza, Berlin ’s KW Institute for Contemporary Art,
and the biennial’s funders, the German Federal Cultural Foundation.
According to a statement posted on
the biennial’s website, “the invited global movements have challenged the
hierarchical structure of the biennial” to “loosen the assumptions of cultural,
institutional, and economic hierarchy and bring the 7th Berlin Biennale into
line with the stated claims to ‘present art that actually works, makes its mark
on reality, and opens a space where politics can be performed’”. The recent
“decentring of power” that took place at the biennial meant that all
curatorial, administrative, communications and budgetary decisions were made
collectively at bi-weekly assemblies. Additionally, the curators were no longer
called curators but “former curators”.
Zmijewski, a curator and artist
known for commenting on the institutionalisation of art, first raised
suspicions among key activists for making curatorial choices they said tended
to “anthropologise and humiliate global movements”. A month into the
two-month-long exhibition, speculation was rampant as to whether the
artist/curator might be using the protest movements as part of his own
meta-work of art. According to the Occupy Wall Street member Noah Singer, the
activists risked becoming “the butt of jokes all over Berlin
and maybe Europe ”.
“Activists were on display in a
pit, with spectators looking over them on a platform,” says Singer. “It was an
exhibition of human beings involved in activist behaviour. Our situation
necessitated calling out the curators and making a counterproposal, where we
voted to change the biennial structure.”
According to Zmijewski, the
biennial’s intention behind involving activists had little to do with
aesthetics. “I didn’t invite them as artists, I invited them as important
political actors of our time to come together and use a cultural institution.
Maybe the ‘human zoo’ was good, because they reacted, and it started a
process,” he says. Asked, if he had to do it over again, whether he would
invite the activists to participate in the biennial, the audibly exasperated
“former curator” responds: “Yes, I think so.”
Florian Malzacher, the
co-programmer of Steirischer Herbst, an arts festival in Graz
that promises “a 24/7 marathon camp on political strategies in art and artistic
strategies in politics” for its September 2012 edition, is sceptical of the
recent events in Berlin .
“For me that sounds just like an symbolic action and a bit naive by the
Occupiers,” he says. “The relationship between art and labour is complicated.
I’m more interested in challenging our own institution in a more complex way
and perhaps changing it long-term,” he adds.