Fourfold increase in value of indemnified art borrowed—and
nearly all of it returned safely
By Martin Bailey. Museums, Issue 242, January 2012
Published online: 08 January 2013
Museums and galleries in England borrowed art indemnified by
the government worth a record £8.6bn last year—a fourfold increase over the
past 15 years. Without this support, most venues would find it difficult to
mount exhibitions with extremely high value loans; if the galleries that
benefited from indemnity had taken out commercial insurance, it would have cost
a total of more than £20m.
The increase mainly reflects the rise in prices on the art
market, particularly for major works. However, the number of venues has also
increased, largely due to new National Lottery-funded buildings, such as Tate
Modern. Works lent to national museums accounted for 75% of the £8.6bn; loans
to other venues made up the rest.
We have obtained the first detailed data on the UK ’s Government Indemnity Scheme, which is
administered by the Arts Council in England
and by the respective governments of Scotland ,
Wales and Northern Ireland .
The scheme covers art loaned from the UK and abroad, for both temporary
exhibitions and long-term loans. (Loans from national museums to other UK museums are not covered, since the rationale is that
the works belong to the nation and it would be inappropriate to use taxpayers’
money to indemnify them.) Indemnity covers conservation (in the event of
damage) and replacement value (in the event of loss, through theft or fire).
Among the exhibitions in the past financial year that
pushed up the figure was the National Gallery’s “Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at
the Court of Milan” (9 November 2011-5 February 2012).
Although only eight paintings by Leonardo were borrowed
(plus works by other artists), the works were all extremely valuable.
Another show that was only viable with indemnity was the Royal Academy ’s
“The Real Van Gogh” in 2010. Although the value of the loans is confidential,
they are likely to have been worth nearly £2bn. Without indemnity, commercial
insurance would have cost the academy around £6m. Given the exhibition was seen
by around 411,000 visitors, this would have worked out at £15 a head. Standard
admission was £12, so insurance costs would have more than doubled the ticket
price to £27.
We have also obtained data on indemnity payouts. In the 14
years up to 2010/11, there were 28 claims on behalf of lenders (an average of
two a year), totalling £303,000 (an average of £10,800 each). These were all
for conservation repairs, and not a single indemnified work was stolen.
Last year, there were two claims, totalling £236,000. One
was for a minor item, but the other was for damage to Miró’s Painting on
White background for the Cell of a Recluse I, 1968, on loan to London’s Tate
Modern (see related story, link above).
No comments:
Post a Comment