Controversy over painting of South African president forces
gallery to close its doors
The Johannesburg High Court will decide if the artist’s
right to freedom of expression outweighs Jacob Zuma’s right to privacy
By Riah Pryor. Web only
Published online: 23 May 2012
A leading South African gallery has temporarily closed amid
mounting controversy over a satirical painting of the country’s president.
Jacob Zuma, the South African president and leader of the African National
Congress (ANC) political party filed a legal suit against the Goodman Gallery, Johannesburg , this month
for displaying a painting by Brett Murray, The Spear, 2011. The painting
depicts Zuma in a mock-heroic pose with exposed genitalia. Zuma and the ANC
contend that the work violates his constitutional right to dignity. The ANC
also says that work refers to stereotypes around African male sexuality. In his
application to have the painting removed, Zuma also demanded that the gallery’s
promotional material be destroyed.
The Goodman Gallery released a statement in which it says
that after “numerous threats of intimidation” it will be temporarily closed.
“We feel that the Goodman Gallery, its staff as well the public visitors are at
risk.”
The Goodman Gallery refused to remove the work. Liza
Essers, the gallery’s director, said that is determined to fight for freedom of
expression and artistic creativity. The work is part of a show “Hail to the
Thief II” and is reported to have been sold before the opening night for
R136,000 ($16,200).
An initial hearing to decide if the artist’s right to
freedom of expression outweighs Zuma’s right to privacy, was held at High Court
in Johannesburg
on 22 May, however no ruling was made and a further hearing was scheduled for
24 May.
The Johannesburg-based City Press newspaper, which had also
received a court order, also refused to remove an image of the painting that it
had posted on its website.
Two men were arrested at the gallery on 22 May for defacing
the painting with black and red paint. They have been charged with malicious
damages to property and the painting has been moved to a safe location. The
attack on the work and subsequent claims that the younger suspect was assaulted
by the gallery’s security guards, has heightened the controversy surrounding Murray ’s painting. “The
extent of the rage has astonished and upset me very much,” Essers said in a
statement released after the incident. “I never imagined that this debate would
transform into harmful, physical action.”
A spokesman for the Nazareth
Baptist Church
told the UK ’s Guardian
newspaper that “this [painting] is an attack on the culture of the majority,
the black people of Africa ”.
Karel Nel, a professor at the University at the
Witwatersrand in Johannesburg ,
was one of the experts who supplied statements for the gallery’s legal defence.
“The works in this exhibition extend the debate on power, sex and patriarchy in
our society,” says Nel. “As an artist, Murray
could be understood in terms of the role of the court jester, who would
traditionally amuse the king, nobleman and courtiers with stories pertinent to
their lives within the circumscribed power of the court.”
This is not the first time that Zuma has taken offence at a
work of art. The South African cartoonist, Jonathan Shapiro (known as Zapiro)
has also been sued by the president over a drawing of him about to rape “Lady
Justice”. In 2006, Zuma was acquitted of raping a family friend.
The gallery has displayed works by politically-engaged
artists throughout the Apartheid era: “We show controversial views in a neutral
space. I respect Zuma’s opinion of the art work as much as any other, but the
issue is the protection of freedom of expression,” Essers says. The Art
Newspaper also submitted a statement for the gallery’s defence, which argued
that it is one of the leading galleries in the African continent and “should be
free to continue to act in support of its artists’ practice”.
No comments:
Post a Comment