Tax-relief cap will curtail major gifts
British government’s proposal to close tax loopholes upsets
museums and their biggest donors
By Martin Bailey. Museums, Issue 235, May 2012
Published online: 26 April 2012
Major projects planned by the UK ’s leading arts organisations and
museums are threatened by tax changes that the British government is proposing
in an attempt to close loopholes enjoyed by the super-rich. In his March
budget, the chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne announced a tax-relief
cap on annual donations to charity above £50,000 or a quarter of an
individual’s income, whichever is greater. Critics argue that this will
discourage very large charitable gifts, and pressure to force a U-turn was
mounting as we went to press.
The cap could have a particularly serious impact on large
museum building projects, which are highly reliant on £1m-plus donations from
private individuals and trusts. These include the extension to Tate Modern (a
£215m project, which still needs £54m), the British Museum extension (£135m, needing
£15m), the development of the Design Museum in Kensington (£80m, needing £18m),
upgrading Tate Britain (£45m, needing £10m), the Victoria and Albert Museum’s
(V&A) project in Dundee (£45m, needing £30m) and the V&A extension in
Exhibition Road (£40m, needing £25m).
Donations at risk
Growing pressure from the charities, including those
raising money for health, education and the elderly, may force the British
government to rethink the proposals. In the cultural sector, Arts Council
England warns that donors are already considering pulling out of important
projects. A council spokeswoman says that major donors have contacted some of
the arts organisations it helps fund to say that if this cap is introduced,
“they will not be able to support them at previous levels”. As a result, “at
least £80m of regular donations to several of our largest organisations could
be at risk”.
The chancellor announced a limit on all uncapped tax
reliefs to ensure that the very wealthy pay a higher proportion of tax. This
affects several forms of relief, including donations to charities. A Treasury
spokesman suggested that a few people are abusing the system by using foreign
charities set up by themselves to reduce their tax liabilities.
Critics of the cap say that it will be a major disincentive
to philanthropy at a time of government cuts. They say there is little evidence
of abuse, and, where it exists, it should be tackled directly. The new system
is likely to be devastating for charities because it will hit the big donors. A
survey by the Charities Aid Foundation estimates that of the £11bn donated in
the UK
in 2009/10, 45% came from 7% of donors.
The National Council for Voluntary Organisations gives an
example of the impact that the new system could have on a very wealthy arts
patron who earns £800,000 a year and responds to an appeal by donating £1m.
Under the current Gift Aid concession, this would result in
£1,250,000 for the recipient. The individual also gets personal tax relief of
£312,500. It effectively costs the donor £687,500 to give £1,250,000 to
charity. Under the new proposals, the donor would only be able to claim tax
relief on 25% of their income, or £200,000. This means the same gift will
effectively cost them £950,000. Most donors would therefore respond to an
appeal with a considerably lower contribution (or possibly decide against
giving at all).
Stephen Deuchar, the director of the Art Fund, says the new
cap could have a “devastating impact”. A fund spokeswoman adds that it will
have “a disproportionate impact on the arts, museums and cultural charities,
which are often dependent on a small pool of larger-value donors”.
Mark Getty, the chairman of London ’s National Gallery, says there is “no
question the gallery and many other organisations will suffer”. Martin Roth,
the director of the V&A, says the change will “adversely impact” potential
donors.
Michael Dixon, the chairman of the National Museums
Directors’ Conference, is “deeply concerned” about the tax-relief cap. A
spokeswoman for the organisation points out that the proposal comes at a time
when the government wants museums to get “a greater contribution from
philanthropy in running the nation’s great cultural institutions”. The
conference is preparing a detailed submission to the government on the possible
effects of the proposed tax change.
The Museums Association is equally worried. Mark Taylor,
its director, says: “It seems bizarre that the government is restricting tax
relief on large donations at precisely the time they want to increase
philanthropy.”
The government has stressed the importance of private
support for the arts. The March budget introduced the Cultural Gifts Scheme,
which offers tax benefits to those who donate pre-eminent objects to museums
and galleries (it is a parallel system to Acceptance in Lieu, which covers
inheritance tax).
The new £100m Catalyst scheme matches private donations to
cultural organisations with Lottery and government money, with the first awards
due to be made later this month. The budget also included a concession allowing
those who leave more than 10% of their bequests to charity to have their
estates subjected to a lower rate of inheritance tax.
Second thoughts?
Critics of the proposed cap say the government has often
drawn parallels with the situation in the US , where, partly because of
greater tax incentives, wealthy donors give a much higher proportion of their
income to charity. In America
those earning more than £150,000 a year give eight times more to charity than
those in Britain .
The tax-relief cap is due to come into effect in April
2013. But after the storm of protest from charities and donors, the Treasury
was having second thoughts. A spokesman says it will “explore with
philanthropists ways to ensure that this measure will not impact significantly
on charities that depend on large donations”. The Treasury minister David Gauke
says: “There will be a proper consultation over the summer and then draft
legislation produced in the autumn.”
No comments:
Post a Comment